Primark as I’m sure you are all aware is surrounded in
controversy. We all know about the claims that children are worked to death in
sweatshops so we can get a t-shirt for the same price as a pint of milk – but
how bad is it really?
Primark is often singled out as the big consumerist bully,
but there are definitely other brands to blame. Nike for example sells millions
of shoes and pieces of clothing each year, but does not produce any of these products. Instead, the company contracts with
manufacturing facilities located throughout the world. Nearly 800,000 people
work in these factories, located primarily in Asia .
Since the 1990's, the company has been criticised for the working conditions and
low wages at these factories, with many critics accusing the company of
profiting from sweatshop labour.
So it seems cheaper brands must make a compromise over more
affordable products and cheap labour, however you may be surprised to know that
more expensive brands are also to blame. Have you ever looked longingly in a
shop window of designer fashion houses such as Burberry? However the Burberry
factory in South Wales is set to close in the
next few months following the decision to export production to China ,
where costs are significantly lower as a result of workers being paid extremely
low wages.
The International Labor
Rights Forum notes that numerous companies and leading brands rely on
sweatshop labour. Is there a real alternative? Not really. Many shops such as
M&S have a fair-trade section but fashion houses and popular high street
brands still use cheap labour. So Primark, although you may be seen as an
immoral, dirty business, the blame doesn’t lie solely on you. Personally I will
not be shopping at Oxford Street ’s
Primark this Christmas. This is not due to its use of cheap labour but mainly just to avoid the massive queues and crowds!
No comments:
Post a Comment